Sunday, May 27, 2007

exclusion or embrace?

In all wars, whether large or small, whether carried out on battlefields, city streets, living rooms, churches or faculty lounges, we come across the same basic exclusionary polarity: "us against them," "their gain--our loss, " "either us or them." The stronger the conflict, the more the rich texture of the social world disappears and the stark exclusionary polarity emerges around which all thought and practice aligns itself. No other choice seems available, no neutrality possible, and therefore no innocence sustainable. If one does not exit that whole social world, one gets sucked into its horrid polarity. Tragically enough, over time the polarity has a macabre way of mutating into its very opposite--into "both us and them" that unites the divided parties in a perverse communion of mutual hate and mourning over the dead.

..........There may indeed be situations in which "there is no choice," though we should not forget that to destroy the other rather than to be destroyed oneself is itself a choice. In most cases, however, the choice is not constrained by an inescapable "either us or them." If there is will, courage and imagination the stark polarity can be overcome. Those caught in the vortex of mutual exclusion can resist its pull, rediscover their common belonging, even fall into each other's arms. People with conflicting interests, clashing perspectives, and differing cultures can avoid sliding into the cycle of escalating violence and instead maintain bonds, even make their life together flourish. Miroslav Volf, Exclusion and Embrace


Post a Comment

<< Home